remember, I've deleted out part of names and XX out part of email addy, to protect the 'innocent' LOL, but it will give you an idea of who you are looking for.
Those requesting kits;
Dorothy C=
Girl=
Bry
Those sharing kits:
Heike peeb8xx@yahoo.com
milamachado machadomxxx@yahoo.com.br
wanie one.knxx@yahoo.ca
patyromana patyromaxx@yahoo.com.br *shared angelflight scraps*
Girl=
Willie Bobo katelynnsmomsxxxx@yahoo.com>
sgoodXX
**Patti**
That's it for now, got stuff to do!
Have a great day!
25 comments:
You've got ot be kidding me, ms.FlashGraphics!!
You say you removed names, but mine is still there! You will have to remove it or some people will start sending YOU threatening emails like you are doing right now!
So..Threatening people is LEGAL? I had NO idea, but something is really wrong with your personality... It is really sad and I hope you will not pass it on. (Please Stay Sterile! :))
As everybody knows, there are FREEBIES on Scrap Blogs, even those for CU!! So if someone uses such a freebie, whether it be a script, a template, a shape or whatever, it is completely legal. You are publishing names and emailadresses of totally innocent people! Nou if you have any guts left, you come out of the closet en tell everybody who you are! But you're a threatening coward without a decent job, so if you're that unhappy, look at yourself an not others (oh yes, how is that diet going? lol...
Your blog is a Crap Blog! Ans stay of the booze, girl!
Hi Marie... Feeling at ease today? ;)
Be sure to look over your shoulder now and then...
WELL THEN, HERE WE ARE:
THE OWNER OF THIS BLOG IS....
MARIE, SHE 'RUNS' SOMETHING CALLED:
http://flashgraphicscreations.blogspot.com/
AND:
http://flashgraphics.org/
YOU CAN CONTACT HER ON HER EMAILADDRESS:
flashgraphics@flashgraphics.org;
OR:
http://www.flashgraphics.org/contactme.htm
JUST IN CASE YOU MIGHT HAVE A EHM...COMPLAINT OR SOMETHING!
GOOD LUCK!
Oh, I forgot! Maybe someone can help her with this:
"Ok, I have come to a dead end on this after searching high and low (without much success) for a decent tutorial on how to create interactive scripts.
I know how to make them, I know how to use them but can't get my head round how to make them interactive and it's driving me crazy!
I would dearly love to share my scripts with you as I have so many but can't until I solve this problem.
I want to be able to make them for other people to use so they can add their own colour choices or backgrounds etc.
If anyone has any tuts on this or is willing to part with their info on how to do this, I would be extremely grateful. I can't tell you how frustrating it is to have so many scripts but not be able to share them because of this one little issue.
Please do let me know if you have anything you can share with me on this subject.
With hugs
Marie"
ANYONE? LOL!
THIS IS FROM FLASHGRAPHICS.
I HAVE BEEN ALERTED ABOUT YOUR BLOG AND HAVE REPORTED YOU FOR IMPERSONATION! THIS IS A SERIOUS OFFENSE!
YOU ARE USING MY NAME AND HAVE POSTED COPIES OF POSTS FROM MY BLOG ALONG WITH MY EMAIL ADDRESS ON TO YOUR BLOG. THIS IS ILLEGAL.
I HAVE HAD TO CONTEND WITH AN IDIOT TODAY WHO HAS BEEN ACCUSING ME OF PUBLISHING THEIR EMAILS ON MY BLOG, NAMING AND SHAMING THEM FOR SHARING. EVENTUALLY I FIND OUT THAT IT WAS NOT MY BLOG AT ALL, BUT YOURS.
REMOVE ALL POSTINGS REGARDING FLASHGRAPHICS IMMEDIATELY OR I WILL BE FORCED TO TAKE THE MATTER FURTHER AND HAVE YOUR BLOG SHUT DOWN.
THIS BLOG HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FLASHGRAPHICS WHATSOEVER AND IF YOU DO NOT REMOVE ALL COMMENTS RELATING TO FLASHGRAPHICS IMMEDIATELY I WILL TAKE THE MATTER FURTHER.
I HAVE BEEN PESTERED ALL DAY BY PEOPLE WHO THINK THIS IS MY BLOG. WHAT YOU HAVE DONE IS ILLEGAL. YOU CANNOT IMPERSONATE SOMEONE AND WILL MAKE SURE THIS BLOG IS SHUT DOWN IF ALL COMMENTS RELATING TO FLASHGRAPHICS ARE NOT REMOVED.
I AM ALSO POSTING A COMMENT ON MY BLOG ABOUT YOU SO EVERYONE KNOWS THAT YOU ARE IMPERSONATING ME! HOW DARE YOU!
JUST WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO ASSUME YOU CAN DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
*I AM ALSO POSTING A COMMENT ON MY BLOG ABOUT YOU SO EVERYONE KNOWS THAT YOU ARE IMPERSONATING ME! HOW DARE YOU!*
Well in that case i believe you are just as guilty and stupid as this blogger posting private things on your blog, i think this blog should be shut down because too many people are wrongly accused or ratted out and they don't even know who they are... so pathetic!
THIS IS NOT FLASHGRAPHICS BLOG I REPEAT NOT FLASHGRAPHICS SHE WOULD NOT LOWER HERSELF TO DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS.i HAVE ALSO REPORTED YOU AND I REALLY HOPE YOU GET SHUT DOWN.IT IS A SICK PERSON WHO IMPERSONATES ANOTHER TO GET ATTENTION YOU ARE A DIGRACE.
FROM FLASHGRAPHICS
I HAVE MADE AN OFFICIAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THIS BLOG AND THE OWNER AFTER FAILING TO REMOVE ALL COMMENTS REGARDING FLASHGRAPHICS.
THIS SITE IS SHAMEFUL AND WHY ON EARTH WOULD THE OWNER WANT TO PUBLISH SUCH MESSAGES. ALL IT DOES IS MAKE THE OWNER LOOK LIKE AN IDIOT.
TO THE PERSON WHO LEFT A MESSAGE WITH THE ID OF "I SAID" FLASHGRAPHICS IS NOT ASSOCIATED WTIH THIS BLOG IN ANY SHAPE OR FORM. I NEVER EVEN KNEW IT EXISTED UNTIL TODAY SO WHEREVER YOU GOT YOUR INFORMATION FROM, YOU WERE GROSSLY MISINFORMED AND AM INSULTED TO THINK THAT PEOPLE WOULD THINK I WOULD RUN SUCH A BLOG.
TO ID HOLDER "I SAID."
I SEE YOU ARE TOO AFRAID TO LEAVE YOUR DETAILS - WHY DON'T YOU WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW WHO YOU ARE? GOT SOMETHING TO HIDE?
WHY ARE YOU LEAVING FALSE INFORMATION ABOUT FLASHGRAPHICS?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
Multiple personalities dear???
You should sees someone for that
Flashgraphics complaining that Flashgraphics is impersonating herself ????
Make NO mistake ,,the other posters are correct .... this IS Flashgraphics blog and it IS going around the groups ....
I have a hate letter from Flashgraphics herself ... the language matches the language in the blog postings .....
IF THIS WAS MY BLOG, I CERTAINLY WOULDN'T LEAVE MESSAGES IN THE COMMENTS AREA, I'D POST ON THE MAIN PAGE WHERE EVERYONE CAN SEE THEM, NOT HIDDEN AWAY UNDER THE COMMENTS AREA AND I CERTAINLY WOULDN'T PUBLISH SUCH RUBBISH!
YOU ARE NOTHING MORE THAN BULLIES TRYING TO CAUSE TROUBLE.
I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU WRITE HERE ANYMORE AND DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR USER GROUPS OR WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY.
I JUST HOPE BLOGGER SHUTS THIS BLOG DOWN VERY SOON.
if she doesn't care anymore (FG) than i believe she should shut this blog down, don't you all think so? More people here say it is FG, but if she'd shut the thing down NOW it would make her even more suspicious and nobody would visit her blog (money money money!) any longer. That's what it's all about, i think...even in her comments she is threatening so i read.
She did this to herself
the way this is going through the groups , no one will be buying a thing from her,no one wants this
your contrived comments to yourself(FG) are fooling no one .... youve apparently wrongly accused and pissed off people all over the world
Flashgraphics is also DeviantDesigner.
If you notice both are in all caps
Well well you malicious piece of chicken shit!!!
Because you got caught file sharing everyone else has to suffer what a bitch.Do you actually think people will believe that this is Flashgraphics blog lmao just because you have copied some of her blog posts hahahaha obviously you have very low intelligence.
In the next 48 hrs everyone will know who owns this blog and you will be named all over blogger.
Oh and hiding behind a computer doesnt help either moron it doesnt stop your full name and address being found which is in progress as we speak you see i have many friends 3 of which live and breathe law enforcement maybe i should mention one covers internet crime and guess what you come under that category aren't you the lucky one.
To all the people who have had their details posted for all to see this is now in hand but in the mean time you are to vet your emails and block as necessary.Now back to you sick bitch impersonating another blog owner to cause harm or upset to others either physically or mentally is a criminal offence so i am here to tell you that you are in shit so deep you will never crawl out.
I will leave that thought with you.
Innoncent people have had their details posted because you are a sick,sad,twisted bitch, you have impersonated Flashgraphics to cause harm to others and to her are you not ashamed????
Is that a knock on the door hahahaha it soon will be!!!!!!!
whoever this is, this blog should be shut down, but the google people are probably not the type to do so, i believe.. scrapaddict, your thoughts are admirable, but i don't believe family or friends in law enforcement can do anything about it, there is just no legislation for cases like this. the best would be to never go to this blog again so it will take all the fun out of the blogging for the blogger. this isn;t a blog, it is harassment.
It always makes me laugh when I see things like this, people LIKE YOU, trying to be artist advocates and oh so "copyright correct" when in fact, YOU are just people who have nothing going for YOURSELF in YOUR own personal lives, and nothing else to live for in reality.
It still amazes me that YOU people think that YOU can get away with slandering, defaming and abusing other people all in the name of *copyright protection* and YOU seem to think that all of this is *ok* and YOU are doing someone somewhere some sort of favor or service of great importance, when in fact no one really gives a shit, other YOURSELF!!.
What a bunch of nasty vile evil witches you all are for posting such lies on this blog about Flashgraphics!
What you have said and done about Flashgraphics is not only a lie but is also illegal.
Be very sure about this, you will be traced, not by your false names or email addresses but by other means! You had all better watch out!
To Mabelenchanted. Who the hell are you? You swing like a ball on a chain, are you sure this isn't your blog?
IF I WRITE IN CAPS, DOES IT MAKE IT MY BLOG?
I have never heard such crap in all my life.
Franny and Mabel are very correct ,and NOTHING that has been said here about flashgraphics is niether a lie nor illegal especially compared to the emails and messages she has sent to us .
Which i hope some of us have saved.
No one here has stolen anything of hers.
Well im waiting for the 48 hours to be up that you claim will reveal it all.
Now I can see which commrnts are hers based on the tone of hysteria.
Is this your blog then Parisian???
Considering you have supposedly received threatening emails off Flashgraphics i see you haven't actually posted anything to prove this.
People like you make me vomit,get off your podium and get in the real world you are all vindictive bitches who need to get a life instead of balming everyone else for your seemingly sick mentality.
You are in violation of the Violence against womens act re-authorization
Sect 113 of this law clearly states that you CANNOT post names and e-mails unless you have posted your REAL name and REAL e-mail as well. Therefor you have been turned into the Legal Arm of Google for violations of the Terms of Agreement, as well as the US DOJ for violations of the above mentioned federal law
TITLE 47 > CHAPTER 5 > SUBCHAPTER II > Part I > § 223
(a) Prohibited acts generally
Whoever—
(1) in interstate or foreign communications—
(A) by means of a telecommunications device knowingly—
(i) makes, creates, or solicits, and
(ii) initiates the transmission of,
any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass another person;
(B) by means of a telecommunications device knowingly—
(i) makes, creates, or solicits, and
(ii) initiates the transmission of,
any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication which is obscene or child pornography, knowing that the recipient of the communication is under 18 years of age, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call or initiated the communication;
(C) makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device, whether or not conversation or communication ensues,or posts private names or e-mails of a private citizen without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number or posted/placed on any and all webpages or sites, who receives the communications;
(D) makes or causes the telephone of another repeatedly or continuously to ring, with intent to harass any person at the called number; or
(E) makes repeated telephone calls or repeatedly initiates communication with a telecommunications device, during which conversation or communication ensues, solely to harass any person at the called number or who receives the communication; or
(2) knowingly permits any telecommunications facility under his control to be used for any activity prohibited by paragraph (1) with the intent that it be used for such activity,
shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(b) Prohibited acts for commercial purposes; defense to prosecution
(1) Whoever knowingly—
(A) within the United States, by means of telephone, makes (directly or by recording device) any obscene communication for commercial purposes to any person, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call; or
(B) permits any telephone facility under such person’s control to be used for an activity prohibited by subparagraph (A),
shall be fined in accordance with title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(2) Whoever knowingly—
(A) within the United States, by means of telephone, makes (directly or by recording device) any indecent communication for commercial purposes which is available to any person under 18 years of age or to any other person without that person’s consent, regardless of whether the maker of such communication placed the call; or
(B) permits any telephone facility under such person’s control to be used for an activity prohibited by subparagraph (A), shall be fined not more than $50,000 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
(3) It is a defense to prosecution under paragraph (2) of this subsection that the defendant restricted access to the prohibited communication to persons 18 years of age or older in accordance with subsection (c) of this section and with such procedures as the Commission may prescribe by regulation.
(4) In addition to the penalties under paragraph (1), whoever, within the United States, intentionally violates paragraph (1) or (2) shall be subject to a fine of not more than $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of violation shall constitute a separate violation complete with fines and or prison terms.
(5)
(A) In addition to the penalties under paragraphs (1), (2), and (5), whoever, within the United States, violates paragraph (1) or (2) shall be subject to a civil fine of not more than $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of violation shall constitute a separate violation complete with fines and or prison terms.
(B) A fine under this paragraph may be assessed either—
(i) by a court, pursuant to civil action by the Commission or any attorney employed by the Commission who is designated by the Commission for such purposes, or
(ii) by the Commission after appropriate administrative proceedings.
(6) The Attorney General may bring a suit in the appropriate district court of the United States to enjoin any act or practice which violates paragraph (1) or (2). An injunction may be granted in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(c) Restriction on access to subscribers by common carriers; judicial remedies respecting restrictions
(1) A common carrier within the District of Columbia or within any State, or in interstate or foreign commerce, shall not, to the extent technically feasible, provide access to a communication specified in subsection (b) of this section from the telephone of any subscriber who has not previously requested in writing the carrier to provide access to such communication if the carrier collects from subscribers an identifiable charge for such communication that the carrier remits, in whole or in part, to the provider of such communication.
(2) Except as provided in paragraph (3), no cause of action may be brought in any court or administrative agency against any common carrier, or any of its affiliates, including their officers, directors, employees, agents, or authorized representatives on account of—
(A) any action which the carrier demonstrates was taken in good faith to restrict access pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection; or
(B) any access permitted—
(i) in good faith reliance upon the lack of any representation by a provider of communications that communications provided by that provider are communications specified in subsection (b) of this section, or
(ii) because a specific representation by the provider did not allow the carrier, acting in good faith, a sufficient period to restrict access to restrict access to communications described in subsection (b) of this section.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (2) of this subsection, a provider of communications services to which subscribers are denied access pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection may bring an action for a declaratory judgment or similar action in a court. Any such action shall be limited to the question of whether the communications which the provider seeks to provide fall within the category of communications to which the carrier will provide access only to subscribers who have previously requested such access.
(d) Sending or displaying offensive material to persons under 18
Whoever—
(1) in interstate or foreign communications knowingly—
(A) uses an interactive computer service to send to a specific person or persons under 18 years of age, or
(B) uses any interactive computer service to display in a manner available to a person under 18 years of age,
any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that is obscene or child pornography, regardless of whether the user of such service placed the call or initiated the communication; or
(2) knowingly permits any telecommunications facility under such person’s control to be used for an activity prohibited by paragraph (1) with the intent that it be used for such activity,
shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
(e) Defenses
In addition to any other defenses available by law:
(1) No person shall be held to have violated subsection (a) or (d) of this section solely for providing access or connection to or from a facility, system, or network not under that person’s control, including transmission, downloading, intermediate storage, access software, or other related capabilities that are incidental to providing such access or connection that does not include the creation of the content of the communication.
(2) The defenses provided by paragraph (1) of this subsection shall not be applicable to a person who is a conspirator with an entity actively involved in the creation or knowing distribution of communications that violate this section, or who knowingly advertises the availability of such communications.
(3) The defenses provided in paragraph (1) of this subsection shall not be applicable to a person who provides access or connection to a facility, system, or network engaged in the violation of this section that is owned or controlled by such person.
(4) No employer shall be held liable under this section for the actions of an employee or agent unless the employee’s or agent’s conduct is within the scope of his or her employment or agency and the employer
(A) having knowledge of such conduct, authorizes or ratifies such conduct, or
(B) recklessly disregards such conduct.
(5) It is a defense to a prosecution under subsection (a)(1)(B) or (d) of this section, or under subsection (a)(2) of this section with respect to the use of a facility for an activity under subsection (a)(1)(B) of this section that a person—
(A) has taken, in good faith, reasonable, effective, and appropriate actions under the circumstances to restrict or prevent access by minors to a communication specified in such subsections, which may involve any appropriate measures to restrict minors from such communications, including any method which is feasible under available technology; or
(B) has restricted access to such communication by requiring use of a verified credit card, debit account, adult access code, or adult personal identification number.
(6) The Commission may describe measures which are reasonable, effective, and appropriate to restrict access to prohibited communications under subsection (d) of this section. Nothing in this section authorizes the Commission to enforce, or is intended to provide the Commission with the authority to approve, sanction, or permit, the use of such measures. The Commission shall have no enforcement authority over the failure to utilize such measures. The Commission shall not endorse specific products relating to such measures. The use of such measures shall be admitted as evidence of good faith efforts for purposes of paragraph (5) in any action arising under subsection (d) of this section. Nothing in this section shall be construed to treat interactive computer services as common carriers or telecommunications carriers.
(f) Violations of law required; commercial entities, nonprofit libraries, or institutions of higher education
(1) No cause of action may be brought in any court or administrative agency against any person on account of any activity that is not in violation of any law punishable by criminal or civil penalty, and that the person has taken in good faith to implement a defense authorized under this section or otherwise to restrict or prevent the transmission of, or access to, a communication specified in this section.
(2) No State or local government may impose any liability for commercial activities or actions by commercial entities, nonprofit libraries, or institutions of higher education in connection with an activity or action described in subsection (a)(2) or (d) of this section that is inconsistent with the treatment of those activities or actions under this section: Provided, however, That nothing herein shall preclude any State or local government from enacting and enforcing complementary oversight, liability, and regulatory systems, procedures, and requirements, so long as such systems, procedures, and requirements govern only intrastate services and do not result in the imposition of inconsistent rights, duties or obligations on the provision of interstate services. Nothing in this subsection shall preclude any State or local government from governing conduct not covered by this section.
(g) Application and enforcement of other Federal law
Nothing in subsection (a), (d), (e), or (f) of this section or in the defenses to prosecution under subsection (a) or (d) of this section shall be construed to affect or limit the application or enforcement of any other Federal law.
(h) Definitions
For purposes of this section—
(1) The use of the term “telecommunications device” in this section—
(A) shall not impose new obligations on broadcasting station licensees and cable operators covered by obscenity and indecency provisions elsewhere in this chapter;
(B) does not include an interactive computer service; and
(C) in the case of subparagraph (C) of subsection (a)(1) of this section, includes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet (as such term is defined in section 1104 [1] of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 note )).
(2) The term “interactive computer service” has the meaning provided in section 230 (f)(2) of this title.
(3) The term “access software” means software (including client or server software) or enabling tools that do not create or provide the content of the communication but that allow a user to do any one or more of the following:
(A) filter, screen, allow, or disallow content;
(B) pick, choose, analyze, or digest content; or
(C) transmit, receive, display, forward, cache, search, subset, organize, reorganize, or translate content.
(4) The term “institution of higher education” has the meaning provided in section 1001 of title 20.
(5) The term “library” means a library eligible for participation in State-based plans for funds under title III of the Library Services and Construction Act (20 U.S.C. 355e et seq.).
you DO realize that you are putting yourself in a pot of legal hot water by putting full names and email addresses out there? Are you stupid or just so miserable in your own life that you need to break a few laws to feel important? Perhaps a combo of the two?
You accused me (which is rich, since I neither shared nor used anything) of stealing. Get your facts straight. I REPLIED to the one sharing's post and you harrassed ME instead.
i dont sharing anything.
what is it?
make this write thing..please..
i want see what you are talking about me..
Post a Comment